Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Virtue of SympathyMagic, Philosophy, and Literature in Seventeenth-Century England$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Seth Lobis

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780300192032

Published to Yale Scholarship Online: May 2015

DOI: 10.12987/yale/9780300192032.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM YALE SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.yale.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Yale University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in YSO for personal use (for details see http://www.yale.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 November 2017

Toward a New History of Sympathy

Toward a New History of Sympathy

Chapter:
(p.1) Introduction: Toward a New History of Sympathy
Source:
Virtue of Sympathy
Author(s):

Seth Lobis

Publisher:
Yale University Press
DOI:10.12987/yale/9780300192032.003.0001

The Introduction begins with a reading of The Tempest, in which Shakespeare sets Prospero’s pursuit of sympathy in the stars and the elements against his subsequent focus on sympathy among his fellow human beings. This shift from the natural and the magical to the moral represents in epitome, and in schematic terms, the historical development of sympathy in the seventeenth century. The Introduction traces historical ideas of natural and cosmic sympathy in Stoic, Platonic, Neoplatonic, Aristotelian, and Pythagorean traditions and shows their strong connection to magical traditions. It then proceeds to major representations of sympathy in early modern Europe and seventeenth-century England in particular, highlighting those of Francis Bacon, Robert Boyle, and John Spencer. With the development of the new sciences in the seventeenth century, sympathy did not simply disappear, as Michel Foucault influentially argued. Rather, it remained a subject of intense scientific interest and gradually migrated into the moral and aesthetic spheres. The Introduction exposes the historiographical gap between natural and moral traditions of sympathy and extends an insight from Max Weber, who, while making too definitive a claim for a monolithic “disenchantment of the world,” rightly associated shifting conceptions of the universe with the enchantment of human relations.

Keywords:   Sympathy, William Shakespeare, The Tempest, Francis Bacon, Robert Boyle, Michel Foucault, Max Weber, Magic, Disenchantment of the World, New Sciences

Yale Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.