Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Virtue of SympathyMagic, Philosophy, and Literature in Seventeenth-Century England$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Seth Lobis

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780300192032

Published to Yale Scholarship Online: May 2015

DOI: 10.12987/yale/9780300192032.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM YALE SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.yale.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Yale University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in YSO for personal use (for details see http://www.yale.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 22 November 2017

“Moral Magick”:

“Moral Magick”:

Cambridge Platonism and the Third Earl of Shaftesbury

Chapter:
(p.198) 5 “Moral Magick”
Source:
Virtue of Sympathy
Author(s):

Seth Lobis

Publisher:
Yale University Press
DOI:10.12987/yale/9780300192032.003.0006

Against the idea of a linear “disenchantment of the world,” this chapter makes a case for the persistence of magical views of sympathy in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. The Cambridge Platonists Ralph Cudworth, Henry More, and Benjamin Whichcote shared a commitment to a vital, magical worldview, defined against the thoroughgoing mechanistic materialism of Hobbes and others, and to a sympathetic view of human nature. They conceived sympathy as a magical principle of the whole; providentially perfect, the order of things constituted a universal system, comprehending the natural as well as the moral. The Cambridge Platonists’ insistence on this overarching order exerted a deep influence on the third Earl of Shaftesbury, long a central figure in the history of sensibility. Shaftesbury supported their rejection of moral relativism and their advancement of a broadly non-mechanistic, magical worldview. For him, the sympathetic universe was not an irrecoverable prelapsarian ideal but a present reality. Yet, in Shaftesbury’s conception of sympathy, the focus has shifted from the natural world to the moral, and from the ontological to the aesthetic; in his principal work, Characteristicks, sympathy emerges as both the unifying force of society and the organizing principle of artistic production.

Keywords:   Third Earl of Shaftesbury, Characteristicks, Ralph Cudworth, Henry More, Benjamin Whichcote, Cambridge Platonists, Sympathy, Magic, Morals, Aesthetics

Yale Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.