Who Says?
Who Says?
Legal and Psychological Constructions of Women's Resistance to Sexual Harassment
This chapter argues that the way in which the law interprets welcomeness—in particular, the insistence that only certain acts “count” as resistance and certain behaviors “imply” consent—reflects a stubbornly androcentric view of female sexuality and men's right of access. Tenaciously maintained despite consistent empirical evidence to the contrary, this view legitimizes men's ability to define reality for their own interests—to have sex when they want it and say that women want it, too, even when women say that they do not. It is further argued here that the welcomeness inquiry is superfluous in most cases and wrongly posed in others; rather than requiring a woman to demonstrate that the man's behavior was offensive, such inquiries should focus on what he did to ascertain that he was welcome.
Keywords: welcomeness, resistance, consent, androcentric view, female sexuality, welcomeness inquiry
Yale Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.
