This book concludes by weighing the claim, which is often made, that the theory of the unitary executive is foreclosed by the sweep of history. This claim is weighed from the perspective of departmentalists who believe in three-branch constitutional interpretation. Departmentalism holds that Congress and the president share with the courts the power and the duty to interpret and enforce the Constitution. Giving one branch—whether it be Congress or the federal courts—the last word in expounding the Constitution's meaning would not only place resolution of a separation-of-powers dispute in the hands of an interested party, it would also stifle valuable interbranch dialogue about the proper interpretation of the Constitution itself. For this reason, departmentalists do not regard a separation-of-powers issue as settled unless there is a consistent practice pursued with the knowledge of the other branches and in which the other branches have acquiesced.
Yale Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.