Broader Implications: Features and Effects of the New Rule
Broader Implications: Features and Effects of the New Rule
This chapter assesses features and effects not directly evident in the rule's formal elements, but that are aspects or likely consequences of its operation: its radically ahistorical quality; its effects on resource distribution, immigration, and violence; and its minimalism. The new rule proposes a radically democratic, ahistorical model for deciding the governance of people on territory. It privileges the preferences of the current population, giving little value to ancient claims; claims based on past facts would not defeat an otherwise valid plebiscite. It does this to resolve one of the core tensions that plagues thinking about self-determination. The new rule cuts through history's thicket of contradictory proofs and contesting principles by identifying a moment of decision: a vote. However, the more difficult problem concerns abuses that take place not in some distant past but today—expulsions, genocides, and abusive policies that alter demography now. The chapter then argues that although secession—like any change—might be destabilizing in the short term, the benefits could be significant.
Keywords: ahistorical model, governance, plebiscite, self-determination, resource distribution, immigration, violence, secession, demography
Yale Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.
